They’re trying hard. But are fashion magazines relevant today? Here’s why we’d say no
By Chantal Brocca
As we all hope of turning a new leaf while we stumble into the New Year, spinning from the massive WTF that was 2020. Fashion begins to kick in as the quirky stress ball of choice, bringing lighthearted fun to both our wardrobes and minds. The big fashion machine has noticed of course, and apparently Spring/Summer trends have set in with brighter colours, large pop-like prints that jump at your face and so much pink you’d think you were in Baby Spice’s carry on luggage. Not to mention head to toe palettes.
Word on the street is we’re all super anxious, so why not indulge in an excess of fashion fun? asks Vogue. Which makes me ask: are fashion magazines still relevant?
It’s not just Vogue, of course, but all big fashion magazines. Sure, yes, escapism and all that. But what really irks me is how, whilst acknowledging our collective panic about the future, Vogue et al often laud those very same players who are the reason for our anxiety, from CEOs to celebs.
Examples include Barbara Amiel, wife of fallen Canadian scion Conrad Black, literally bragging ‘my excess knows no bounds’ in a Vogue interview, just weeks before her husband was jailed for plundering the finances of his Hollinger empire. Which included the depleting his employee’s pension funds. Oops.
Are Fashion Magazines Relevant Today?
Or let’s look at Vogue’s recent love affair with the Kardashians. Ever since their (in)famous Kimye cover, the magazine (and many others) has been loving not only Kim, but Kylie and of course, Kendall – who has been in literally every issue of every magazine I’ve seen for the past few months, in some form or another.
Can we just take a moment to reflect on the fact that the Kardashians not only represent all that is excessive and greedy about the world, but also that their K-Dash fashion line is made in sweatshops? Why are we celebrating these people?
Vogue also seems to be way, way off the mark when it comes to reading public sentiment.
For example? A few years ago, British Prime Minister Theresa May was on their cover. Which would be fine, if she had actually done anything of note. But this unelected official (she was put into power when her predecessor, David Cameron, had to step down in shame after badly miscalculating how happy Brits would be to leave the EU) has done very little in her few months in office to warrant such kudos.
So why was she so prominently featured? Vogue claimed she really knows how to rock a kitten heel. Oh.
And speaking of covers, Vogue has produced some that are just, well, disgusting. I’m thinking of the one with LeBron James and Gisele, where he was ‘portraying’ King Kong and she, the damsel in distress. Or Vogue France’s Stephanie Seymour cover, where it seemed she was being choked to death by a male model, who was loving it. (Oh, and it was shot by alleged sexual predator Terry Richardson, surprise, surprise).
And then there’s the sexy evening wear shoot that featured cherry red nails, stiletto heels, slinky gold gowns….on a ten year old model. That’s right. Ten. Years. Old. Oh, and shot on a real dead tiger’s skin, just for fun.
These magazines get away with bombarding us with images that continue to oppress women, children and minority groups by claiming that these are ‘edgy’ and ‘artistic’. And if you protest, clearly you must be some unshaven, un-chic hippy who just doesn’t ‘get it’.
Fashion Faux Pas
But let’s get back to fashion.
By definition, fashions do indeed change, but I think all of us are a little tired at this point of the dizzying carousel that is today’s seemingly endless fashion seasons. Still, Vogue and other ‘top’ magazines insist on playing the game. But come on. I think we can all agree that only the most insecure actually follow ‘fashion trends’ anymore. What more of us are concerned about is a) looking good in general and b) not killing the planet or exploiting people while we do it.
However, with few exceptions (Eluxe being one of them), mainstream magazines are beholden to their advertisers – which are normally nasty chemical-infused cosmetics labels and highly unethical fashion brands. Those advertisers want us to buy more, more, more of their crap. And the job of all mainstream fashion magazines is to push it.
Sure, they pay lip service to organic beauty and sustainable fashion brands. But how can you take their recommends seriously, when on one page, they’re touting the best vegan bags, and on the next, they have a 10 year old model lounging on an actual tiger skin?
Clearly, fashion marketing dictates what we ‘should’ and ‘shouldn’t’ wear – and it’s basically a form of brainwashing. Social conditioning. Social engineering. And speaking of which, magazines go even further than promoting corporate fashion and beauty interests through advertising and shoots by lauding the same old elites (via interviews) who serve to perpetuate the economic, ethical and environmental messes that we’re all currently in. I’ve even seen advertisements for joining the army (the army!) in some women’s magazines. Talk about pushing a war agenda!
And don’t even get me started on Teen Vogue. Their cheerleading for abortion, transgenderism, Communism and even S&M and anal sex have no place in a fashion magazine aimed at 11-15 year olds.
Of course, another agenda high on the list for most fashion magazines today is ‘wokeness.’ Elle, for example, has a whole section of their online magazine devoted to BLM. And literally every single fashion magazine under the Conde Nast or Hearst umbrellas worships the movement uncritically.
Whether you support that group and ‘woke’ dogma is kind of irrelevant. The point is, we buy fashion magazines to read about, well, fashion. Why are we being bombarded with politics? I mean, if I want more info on that stuff, I’ll turn on the news or buy Time or The Economist. Thanks very much.
Ha. I think we’re all wising up to the destructive agendas of mainstream fashion magazines. There’s a reason that fashion blogs are on the rise, including sustainable fashion and organic beauty blogs like these. And rather than using Vogue’s admittedly gorgeous, expensively shot images on our mood boards, we’re looking at Instagram feeds and pinning street style shots from Pinterest instead.
In short, the internet has brought on a major change in how we see media. And as any fashion editor can tell you, paper magazine sales are on a steep decline, and advertising revenues are falling.
In fact, Vogue’s parent company, Conde Nast, is rumoured to be up for sale, which will surely shake up the world of publishing. You know what I say? Viva la revolucion!
What are your thoughts? Are fashion magazines relevant today? Let us know in the comments, below
- 10 Ethical Wedding Dress Designers For 2023 - April 11, 2023
- How To Do Grunge Fashion Sustainably - February 3, 2023
- A History Of Runway Fashion: Salons & Superstars - March 29, 2022
4 thoughts on “Opinion: Are Fashion Magazines Relevant Today?”
The fashion establishment is no longer relevant but will fight tooth and nail to remain so. Paid for ads, paid for articles and the same paid for clique do nothing except reinforce the distance there is between them and us. Small brands offer more customer friendly options and an authentic/real experience that isn’t tainted by a forced political narrative. Vogue etc used to look for the next big thing. It was more organic. Now it’s the same old conveyor belt, with the same old poses and the same old message. There is nothing positive. Nothing to uplift and inspire young women. It’s the same suppression behind a different eye liner. The empire is crumbling people and I’m glad to be on this side of the fence.
I’d also add that many women feel that reading a magazine like Vogue is bad for us, like smoking or sunbathing. No one wants to look at 400 pages of painfully thin models anymore. They are out of touch in regards to size diversity and the body positive movement. They use words like “aspirational”, but we are not aspiring to be someone else anymore. Nor should we be.
We’ve gone from Kim K being the new standard of beauty, then to Ashley G being one of the hottest new models, and now we are already at the stage where these women are not “the new standard of beauty”, but rather that “there is no standard of beauty”. We want inclusiveness. We don’t want one size to be held up as a standard, whether that size is a size zero or 16. Everyone has already evolved past this notion.
To me, there isn’t much difference between Vogue 2017 and Vogue 1997 in this regard. They are still holding up a standard of beauty from 20 years ago. They are Blockbuster Video doing away with late fees while Netflix introduces streaming. Knock it off with the tall lanky girls, limbs akimbo, all angles and no curves. Yawn. They’ve been showing this silhouette since Kate was Calvin’s muse. It is Boring, boring, boring.
The internet is light years ahead in this regard. The body positive movement was born online. So do I think Vogue is relevant? Not to me.
OMG Roxanne! This is like, the BEST READER COMMENT EVER! Maybe you should write an article for us one day? Love how you express yourself, and agree with totally everything!! 🙂