Frightening Frequencies: The Dangers of 5G

The potential dangers of 5G are very real. Here’s what you need to know

By Jody McCutcheon

As the old saying goes, give us an inch and inevitably we’ll want a mile. And certainly, this sentiment is true with technology.

Who doesn’t want faster, bigger (or smaller), more efficient? Take wireless mobile telecommunications. Our current broadband cellular network platform, 4G (or fourth generation), allows us to transmit data faster than 3G and everything that preceded. We can access information faster now than ever before in history. What more could we want? Oh, yes, transmission speeds powerful enough to accommodate the (rather horrifying) so-called  Internet of Things. Which brings us to 5G.

Until now, mobile broadband networks have been designed to meet the needs of people. But 5G has been created with machines’ needs in mind, offering low-latency, high-efficiency data transfer. It achieves this by breaking data down into smaller packages, allowing for faster transmission times. Whereas 4G has a fifty-millisecond delay, 5G data transfer will offer a mere one-millisecond delay–we humans won’t notice the difference, but it will permit machines to achieve near-seamless communication. Which in itself  may open a whole Pandora’s box of trouble for us – and our planet.


Dangers of 5G

More bandwidth – more dangers of 5G

Let’s start with some basic background on 5G technology. Faster processing speeds require more bandwidth, yet our current frequency bandwidths are quickly becoming saturated. The idea behind 5G is to use untapped bandwidth of the extremely high-frequency millimeter wave (MMW), between 30GHz and 300GHz, in addition to some lower and mid-range frequencies.

High-frequency MMWs travel a short distance. Furthermore, they don’t travel well through buildings and tend to be absorbed by rain and plants, leading to signal interference. Thus, the necessary infrastructure would require many smaller, barely noticeable cell towers situated closer together, with more input and output ports than there are on the much larger, easier to see 4G towers. This would likely result in wireless antennas every few feet, on every lamp post and utility pole in your neighbourhood.

Here are some numbers to put the dangers of 5G into perspective: as of 2015, there were 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings. That’s double the 2002 number. Yet 5G would require exponentially more, smaller ones, placed much closer together, with each emitting bursts of radiofrequency radiation (RFR)–granted, at levels much lower than that of today’s 4G cell towers–that will be much harder to avoid because these towers will be ubiquitous. If we could see the RFR, it would look like a smog that’s everywhere, all the time.

Dangers of 5G

Serious health concerns

First, it’s important to know that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a potential 2B carcinogen and specified that the use of mobile phones could lead to specific forms of brain tumors.

Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:

  • DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
  • oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature ageing)
  • disruption of cell metabolism
  • increased blood-brain barrier permeability
  • melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
  • disruption of brain glucose metabolism
  • generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)

As mentioned, the new 5G technology utilizes higher-frequency MMW bands, which give off the same dose of radiation as airport scanners. The effects of this radiation on public health have yet to undergo the rigours of long-term testing. Adoption of 5G will mean more signals carrying more energy through the high-frequency spectrum, with more transmitters located closer to people’s homes and workplaces–basically a lot more (and more potent) RFR flying around us – and our environment. It’s no wonder that apprehension exists over potential risks, to both human and environmental health.

Perhaps the strongest concern involves adverse effects of MMWs on human skin. This letter to the Federal Communications Commission, from Dr Yael Stein of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, outlines the main points. Over ninety percent of microwave radiation is absorbed by the epidermis and dermis layers, so human skin basically acts as an absorbing sponge for microwave radiation. Disquieting as this may sound, it’s generally considered acceptable so long as the violating wavelengths are greater than the skin layer’s dimensions. But MMW’s violate this condition.

Furthermore, the sweat ducts in the skin’s upper layer act like helical antennas, which are specialized antennas constructed specifically to respond to electromagnetic fields. With millions of sweat ducts, and 5G’s increased RFR needs, it stands to reason that our bodies will become far more conductive to this radiation. The full ramifications of this fact are presently unclear, especially for more vulnerable members of the public (e.g., babies, pregnant women, the elderly), but this technology

What’s more, MMWs may cause our pain receptors to flare up in recognition of the waves as damaging stimuli. Consider that the US Department of Defense already uses a crowd-dispersal method called the Active Denial System, in which MMWs are directed at crowds to make their skin feel like it’s burning, and also has the ability to basically microwave populations to death from afar with this technology if they choose to do so. And the telecommunications industry wants to fill our atmosphere with MMWs?

5G harms animals, most of all

Unfortunately, innocent animals have already been the victims of testing to see MMW’s effects on living cells. Extrapolating the results from animal testing to humans isn’t straightforward, but the results nonetheless raise some serious red flags. Perhaps most significantly, a US National Toxicology Program study noted that male rats exposed to RFR for nine hours a day over two years developed rare forms of tumours in the brain and heart, and rats of both sexes developed DNA damage.

The researchers noted that the increased risk to the rats was relatively small; but if these findings translate to humans, the widespread increase in cellphone use could have a significant impact on populations. Thus the NTP study served to renew the debate about the potential harmful effects of cellphones on human health. Not only that, it caused a significant shift in the American Cancer Society’s understanding of radiation and cancer, and sparked them to state that our ignorance of RFR’s impact on human health could be compared to our previous obliviousness to the connection between smoking and lung cancer.

Other animal research worldwide illustrates how microwave radiation in general and MMW’s in particular can damage the eyes and immune system, cell growth rate, even bacterial resistance. An experiment at the Medical Research Institute of Kanazawa Medical University showed that 60GHz millimeter-wave antennas produce thermal injuries in rabbit eyes, with thermal effects reaching below the eye’s surface.

This study, meanwhile, suggests low-level MMW’s caused lens opacity–a precursor to cataracts–in rats’ eyes. A Chinese study demonstrated that eight hours’ of microwave radiation damaged rabbits’ lens epithelial cells. A Pakistani study concluded that exposure to mobile phone EMF prevented chicken embryo retinal cells from properly differentiating.

This Russian study revealed that exposing healthy mice to low-intensity, extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation severely compromised their immune systems. And a 2016 Armenian study concluded that low-intensity MMW’s not only depressed the growth of E. coli and other bacteria, but also changed certain properties and activity levels of the cells. The same Armenian study noted that MMW interaction with bacteria could lead to antibiotic resistance – distressing news, considering immunity to bacteria is already compromised due to the overuse of antibiotics.

Finally, this study and this one make the most worrying observations of all. They state that various animal studies show a significant effect of microwaves in the 5G frequency range on mammals, avian species, and insect pollinators such as honey bees. These frequencies interfere with the migratory and nesting patterns of birds, as well as their reproductive habits, and kill off the insects they need to eat to survive. There even appears to be a negative impact on plant life in the vicinity of cellphone towers, to the point where there are notable decreases in fruit and other crop yields.

Again, if these findings translate to humans, our rampant cellphone use would likely cause profound, adverse health effects; an increase in MMW’s as more bandwidth is introduced could further complicate the matter.

What’s important to note here is that the danger of 5G technology can not only have a profound impact on human health, but on the health of all living organisms it touches, including plants, as we shall see in more detail, below.

The dangers of 5G extends to the planet, too

Equally disturbing, 5G technology puts environmental health at risk in a number of ways.

First, MMWs may pose a serious threat to plant health. This 2010 study showed that the leaves of aspen seedlings exposed to RFR exhibited symptoms of necrosis, while other studies state that EMF frequencies have found physiological and morphological changes, in plants, as well as increased micronuclei formationaltered growth and adverse cell characteristics, such as thinner cell walls and smaller mitochondria. Plant irradiation is bad news for the planet’s flora, but it’s bad news for us, too: it could contaminate our food supply.

Secondly, the 5G infrastructure poses a serious threat to our planet’s atmosphere. Network implementation will require the deployment of many, short-lifespan satellites via suborbital rockets propelled by hydrocarbon rocket engines. According to this 2010 California study, launching these rockets will vomit enough black carbon into the atmosphere to pollute global atmospheric conditions, affecting distribution of ozone and temperature. Worse, solid-state rocket exhaust contains chlorine, an ozone-destroying chemical. Additionally, beaming 5G down from space will interfere with our planet’s Schumann Resonance, the frequency naturally emitted from the Earth, which regulates the circadian rhythms of all living things. How can any government seriously concerned about climate change allow for this?

Thirdly, 5G will potentially threaten entire natural ecosystems. According to several reports over the last two decades–some of which are summarized here–low-level, non-ionizing microwave radiation affects insect, bird and bee health. It drives birds from their nests and causes plume deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship and death. Bee populations suffer from reduced egg-laying abilities of Queen bees and smaller colony sizes. Insects die off, meaning amphibians, birds and reptiles starve.

More evidence of ecosystem disruption comes from this 2012 meta-study, which indicates that 593 of 919 research studies suggest that RFR adversely affects plants, animals and humans.

It bears repeating: 5G is bad news for all living creatures and the planet we share.

Dangers of 5G

Beware the propaganda deluge

Despite being fully aware of all these unsettling results, threats and concerns, the US corporatocracy continues to maintain a gung-ho attitude about 5G. The Mobile Now Act was passed in 2016, and many US states have since gone ahead with 5G plans. The telecom industry’s biggest players have basically co-opted government powers to enforce their 5G agenda, with companies like AT&T and Qualcomm having begun live testing. And despite research showing serious threats to humans and the planet, the FCC Chairman announced intentions to open low-, mid- and high-frequency spectrums, without even mentioning a single word about the dangers.

They’re going to sell this to us as ‘faster browsing speeds’ – but the truth is, you’ll barely even notice the difference. They’re going to call anyone who protests against 5G a ‘Luddite’ or ‘technophobe’ or a ‘conspiracy theorist’ – despite the tens of thousands of peer reviewed studies that demonstrate clearly how damaging 5G is. Recently, information about 5G and groups protesting its roll out have been censored; wiped off the internet.

We need to ask: why such a willingness to embrace another new technology – even though it carries serious risks and brings spurious benefits? Why not heed the lessons learned from killer products like asbestos, tobacco and leaded gasoline?

Because a tiny percentage of people will gain an awful lot of money, is one reason. And because companies and governments will be given unprecedented amounts of power over civilians is the other.

All isn’t doom and gloom, though. At least one US politician is maintaining some level-headedness: in October, California Governor Jerry Brown stopped legislation that would have allowed the telecom industry to inundate the state with mini-towers. Brown’s bold actions have permitted localities a say in where and how many cell towers are placed.

The state of Hawaii has stopped 5G and smart meters by collectively threatening to charge every person who installed such meters with liability for any health problems residents may suffer. Moreover, 180 scientists have started a petition to warn of the dangers of 5G, especially its potential health effects. Maybe these actions will afford more time for additional studies and data collection. Just as importantly, maybe they’ll cause other politicians and figureheads to reflect on what they’ve been pushing for.

Take action

In the meantime, we as individuals must do everything we can to protect ourselves against the dangers of 5G. Here’s what you can do:

  • Understand EMFs and their behaviours. Unfortunately, most commercial radiation detectors can only check for 4G and 3G, though.
  • Plant trees. Tons of trees. Trees block 5G signals.
  • Protect yourself with an EMF Shield to mark and protect you from hotspots. Try a patented product that neutralizes the harmful effects of mobile phones and other EMF emitting devices on humans.
  • Whenever possible, limit your exposure: use an anti-radiation headset or speaker mode while talking on a cellphone.
  • Spread the word! These stickers are a great way to embed the dangers of 5G in the public consciousness.
  • Learn more. This network has tons of great information and ideas on how to protect yourself.
  • Just refuse to use 5G phones and devices. Full stop. And discourage those you know from doing so.
  • Refuse to buy anything ‘smart’ – ‘smart’ appliances, ‘smart’ heaters, etc.
  • Some believe that carrying shungite crystals can offer some protection from radiation – not too sure about this one, though it can’t hurt, I suppose.
  • No matter what, do NOT get a smart meter – these put high levels of 5G radiation right in your home
  • Join the growing numbers of dissenters against the dangers of 5G. Get active with them here.
  • Do as the Hawaiians have done and threaten smart meter and 5G tech installers with liability and class action lawsuits. You can learn how to do that here.
  • Spread the word! Please share this article with everyone you know, Print out these posters, below and slip them into people’s mailboxes. Post them on street lights.

Even if the policy drivers and governments aren’t doing their due diligence, at least we can say we’re doing ours.

Dangers of 5G


Thousands march in Switzerland against 5G 

Radiation concerns halt 5G in Brussels, home of the European Union

Plans for 5G masts killed in Brighton, UK

5G campaigners halt 5G installation in Devonshire, UK 

Scientists warn of grave dangers of 5G 

Additional Sources


Jody McCutcheon

This site uses affiliate links with brands we trust, and if you make a purchase using a link, we may receive a commission.

Did you enjoy this post? Want to show your gratitude? Please support us on Patreon!

Patreon logo Become a Patron

Share this page: 

This site uses affiliate links with brands we trust, and if you make a purchase using a link, we may receive a commission.



  • Reply
    Sep 26, 2018 at 11:54 pm

    If you refuse 5g, will you be able to use your phone? Will 4g still function after they install 5g?

    • Reply
      Sep 27, 2018 at 6:19 am

      That’s a great question! They may well try to phase out anything that runs on anything but 5g. But to be honest, your phone’s function is the least of your worries – even if you have no phone at all, you will be radiated by the 5G masts that will be installed all over urban areas – i mean ALL OVER. The key is for ALL of us to be aware of these dangers and to stop 5G before it happens! Once it’s in place, every man, woman, child and even animal will be subject to its harmful effects.

      • Reply
        Mathew Kimbrell
        Nov 6, 2018 at 6:52 pm

        Well being an RF engineer…. I can tell you that I would MUCH rather be near an antenna than far away from an antenna. You have an transmitter / antenna in your pocket (cell phone) and so does every one near you.
        Automatic Gain Control on your cell phones controls how much your cell phone needs to be amplified to reach the tower. The tower itself does not have to push out much power because it is not meant to. It only needs to service those around it, so if you are not in a serviced area your phone pushes out max power and so does every other phone around you. 5G actually helps reduce the overall RF radiation by turning down the AGC on every cell phone around you. That is why your phone dies when you are out of range of a tower. We don’t need less towers that would make it worse we need more towers and that is what 5G will do. So many people talking about things they have no idea what they are talking about.

        • Reply
          Nov 6, 2018 at 7:21 pm

          That’s simply not true Mathew – 5G radiation runs on a completely different frequency to wifi.

        • Reply
          Feb 22, 2019 at 7:43 pm

          That’s an absolute lie. Either you are someone who’s working for a company rolling this out or you have money invested. The proof has been exposed by former military and industry whistleblowers. Get right with God before you tell another public lie like that one where a pregnant woman may believe you! Tell the truth!

          • Kathryn
            Feb 22, 2019 at 8:02 pm

            I was replying to Mr Kimball. Professor Curtis Bennett of Canada Chief, International Science Advisory Board states, “Are there actually guidelines for how long you can put a baby in a microwave?” The only test for humans was a plastic head, hollowed out at the top, filled with water. Microwave energy does NOT melt plastic. I’m sending these articles to Trump every day. New Zealand has outlawed 5G, Sweden has outlawed it and a multitude of other countries who aren’t letting greed blind them to the deadly microwave tech. What will you do? Write to He’s an expert on the effects of microwave damage to the human body.

          • Andrea
            Feb 26, 2019 at 11:48 am

            Sweden outlawed 5g? Ericsson is one of the biggest Swedish companies, and they just started rolling it out:

          • Chere
            Feb 26, 2019 at 6:31 pm

            This is terrible news… 🙁

          • Jake
            Jun 3, 2019 at 11:14 am

            “New Zealand has outlawed 5G, Sweden has outlawed it” that’s not true at all. NZ banned Huawei from their 5g networks due to security concerns and Swedish Ericsson has launched the largest European wide 5g network

          • Chere
            Jun 3, 2019 at 7:51 pm

            The whole Hauwei security risk is a distraction from the REAL dangers of 5G. As for Sweden, perhaps Kathryn got confused with Switzerland, where 5G is banned (as well as in Israel, Brussels (where most of the European Union employees live) and Finland is now pushing for a full ban.

        • Reply
          John Negrete
          May 7, 2019 at 8:03 pm

          MATHEW KIMBRELL, Wow really? As an RF technician working in the field OSP for over 30 years, I’m shocked and disappointed you would even say that. Yet having dealt with any RF engineers over the years always working on their CAD program never leaving their desk. In my experience, most of them would still have some idea of the problems and the inherent risks with transmitting wireless signals in that spectrum. Using millimeter waves that broadcast at frequencies between 30 and 300 gigahertz and the sheer number of small cells required to build the network, come on dude!. The so-called internet of things is just going to be used as another system of control and is not worth the health risks to the public.

      • Reply
        Dec 6, 2018 at 10:18 am

        So much for tin foil hats. We’ll have to get tin foil suits. LOL.
        If they force me to install in my home, I will build a steel box around the installation.

        • Reply
          Dec 6, 2018 at 7:27 pm

          Right?? It’s also worth investing in an EMF monitor

    • Reply
      Dawn Stokes
      Dec 4, 2018 at 2:52 am

      First of all, one will likely not be able to “refuse 5G” if you use a commercial cellular device.

      Modern devices use Digital Signal Processors (DSP), which is electronics that determine what frequencies are available, strongest frequencies, and choose a given frequency based on signal-strength, predetermined rules, etc. Therefore, perhaps one could disable the 5GNR (New Radio – see below what NR means), but not sure if device manufacturers would support being able to disable.

      It’s important to recognize that portions of what many people refer to as 5G are actually the evolution of 4G through the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard, which is funny because that would mean an evolution of Long Term Evolution, sort of like “you only YOLO once” redundancy.

      Therefore, a portion of “5G”, the portion that is not 5G New Radio (5GNR) that uses millimeter wave (mmWave) radio frequencies (RF), will be around as such for quite a while.

      This is because of many reasons, mostly to do with the incredible investment/network build-out required for 5GNR in terms of new antennas, many, MANY new antennas. Many of these antennas must be so-called “Smart Antennas” that beam the energy where needed most. These are used already with LTE, but they are even more necessary for 5GNR due to the very high frequency of mmWave RF propagation, which is prone to fading (losing signal over distance) and attenuation (losing signal due to being blocked by objects such as buildings, trees, etc.).

      Therefore, 5GNR will not be so great for indoor penetration, urban canyons, real canyons, etc. Even some of the early 5G fixed wireless (like what Verizon is coming out with) will require relatively high-mounted antennas so as to reach above trees and other obstacles.

      • Reply
        Dec 4, 2018 at 3:10 am

        5G will be transmitted globally by sattellite

        • Reply
          peter jones
          May 13, 2020 at 6:31 pm

          no it wont, why do you think they are going to need more towers, because the range is for less than even 4g.

    • Reply
      Judith Pecho
      May 22, 2020 at 5:08 am

      Verizon told me that it would for a period of time but not indefinitely. Back to cord phone and answering machines.

  • Reply
    Researchers creating a new class of 5G millimeter wave transmitter antenna designs that will soon occupy over a billion mobile devices | The Crazz Files
    Sep 16, 2018 at 11:44 am

    […] problems – One study showed that millimeter and submillimeter wave frequencies interact with human sweat glands. This could potentially lead to preferential layer absorption on the […]

    • Reply
      Billy Bob
      Jan 14, 2020 at 5:17 pm

      btw, visible light is about 100 times smaller than that, in the nanometer range, so…

  • Reply
    Jul 31, 2018 at 6:32 pm

    Silent weapons for quiet wars.

    • Reply
      Aug 4, 2018 at 3:06 am

      Agree. But we WILL NOT be silent about these quiet wars! 😉

    • Reply
      MJ Raichyk
      Feb 12, 2019 at 2:42 pm

      Ha! just ask the wives of the guys who repair the 4G towers just how destroyed their husbands are after working on even the 4G towers.. they get higher pay because it’s HAZARD PAY not because it requires more wizardry.

  • Reply
    Elspeth Nicol
    May 26, 2018 at 12:54 am

    How many telecoms engineers and other employees of telecoms companies die early as a result of the dangers highlighted by you and many other sources?

    • Reply
      Sep 19, 2018 at 7:24 am

      Elspeth Nicol, the 5G network antenna’s have not been installed as yet, they are in the process of doing that now. They will only start emitting RFR after they are operational (switched on). Your theory of employees being effected from this as a result of them installing the antennas is ridiculous. Not only are they not switched on, any possible damage happens over a long term of being exposed to such antenna’s.. All those who happen to live near an antenna. Two painfully obvious reasons whyyour thinking is way off point.

      • Reply
        Thor Anderson
        Apr 14, 2019 at 10:25 pm
        ABC-7 News: LA Firefighters Halt Cell Towers on Fire Stations Due to Radiation Concerns
        Firefighters Do Not Want Cell Towers On Their Schools Because of the “Hazardous” Radiation: Compare it to Cigarettes
        Firefighters Living Next to Cell Towers Suffer Neurological Damage

        “The fire station cell tower measured at 1/1000th to 2/1000th of the allowable FCC limit of non-ionizing radiation. That means the towers could be almost 1000 times more powerful than the level the firefighters were exposed to, and still be considered within FCC guidelines. And yet even at these levels of radiation, we found brain abnormalities and measurable neurological deficits.”
        “Once cell towers were activated on or adjacent to their fire stations, they could no longer function without severe headache, inability to sleep, and foggy thinking. These are not symptoms we wish to see in our First Responders.”

      • Reply
        Kit Williams
        May 20, 2019 at 11:12 pm

        Actually Frank — Elspeth Nicols comment was a question and a very good one to — Ok so you being a ‘Scientific Researcher of course are aware that RFR has not been ‘switched on’ but can I correct you — it is not going to be a case of ‘those who live near an antenna’ because everyone will live near one – it will not be an antenna as for 4G but will require much smaller boxes placed on every lamp post, in every smart meter in every house and that ‘is going to be very ‘painful’ for one obvious reason!! — and I am Not a Scientific Researcher!!

      • Reply
        Judith Pecho
        May 22, 2020 at 5:05 am

        Frank what are you inferring??

    • Reply
      peter jones
      May 13, 2020 at 6:25 pm

      none, i am now 72 and worked with microwave systems in telecommunications for over 15 years. neither myself or any of my co works have heath problems due microwave transmission.

  • Reply
    May 7, 2018 at 4:20 pm

    Already man kind has found so many ways to harm ourselves , the planet and our co-habitants. 5G is our next and probably last battle. I am sure that having read any of the many disturbing reports and research studies into this will agree this must be stopped !

    • Reply
      Nick lance
      Aug 14, 2018 at 10:23 pm

      Stopped? Stop kidding yourself 5G has been fully developed and it’s probably going to be released in late 2018 in the US

      • Reply
        Jan 10, 2019 at 12:45 am

        wrong 🙂

        • Reply
          Ultimate G
          May 1, 2019 at 8:34 pm

          WHITE man.
          Humanity has been forced, by the fork tongued demons, to adopt their evil, in order to survive.

          Don’t keep blaming ‘Man’. Man lives with, and loves, nature and humanity. But one species….well….look at what they’ve done to wherever they stole.

          • Blocky Orbits
            Jun 17, 2019 at 8:56 pm

            The Jewish man is to blame.

      • Reply
        That One Kid c;
        Mar 13, 2019 at 5:57 pm

        Unfortunately, yes..

      • Reply
        Carrie L Fellows
        Apr 17, 2019 at 12:11 am

        Your direct truth is understood. And if satellites, drones already have “dustified” home and relocated to a dense 5G area, without income stability, climate with hail and flood taking out electric while running through body, Drones replace man with computers to “correct” and my brain/body induced with inner A.I. : teaching Electronic Radiation Frequency technology (without devices of hard technology and direct sensor nodes inside altering life completely) , we have no option but to accept that 5G exist and is not going away before humans adapt. Just to un-listenable yo most, yes?

    • Reply
      Paulo Rufalco
      Jan 30, 2019 at 11:12 pm

      “Our next last battle”: a good name for a article, book or even a doc about 5G technology.

      • Reply
        Jan 30, 2019 at 11:49 pm

        Ha! So true! 😉

    • Reply
      Geraldine Gallidoro
      Apr 15, 2019 at 6:30 pm

      These are matters of grave concern. Very alarming indeed! The thing is we humans are never satisfied with anything, it’ll never be enough and that is what ‘s taken us so far. Humans the most miserable creatures. And money is the root to all evil.

    • Reply
      dr Loo
      Jun 1, 2019 at 9:58 am

      Next step,… paranoia and intimacy violation.
      Not good for privacy, this technology.
      Not good for health, frequency are dangerous for all molecules/cell structures/ proteins /DNA,… for all living creatures. I know, … low intensity, but radiations are accumulated in time (installing cancer and mutations)
      Stupid people rules.

1 2 3 12

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.