Why Topshop Is Unethical Fashion At Its Worst

Many love to buy clothes here. But we think Topshop is unethical fashion in its worst form. Here’s why

By Chiara Spagnoli Gabardi

If you live in the UK, stores like Topshop, Topman, Miss Selfridge,  Burton, Evans, Dorothy Perkins and Wallis  dominate the high street, and these are spreading. New York has a huge Topshop flagship, and Topman isn’t far behind.

Virtually all the stores named deliver internationally, and have millions of customers. If you were one of them, you’ll certainly be thinking twice before returning once you get to the bottom of this article.

Primark, the Gap and H&M are often cited as being the least ethical high street shops. But it seems any store owned by Phillip Green, the owner of Topman, Miss Selfridge and of course, Topshop, sells unethical fashion at its worst. Here’s why.

Topshop is unethical fashion

Hey, Big Spender!

Philip Green is the head of the Arcadia Group, a multinational retailing company headquartered in London. It owns, amongst other shops, Dorothy Perkins, Evans, Topman, Miss Selfridge  and of course Topshop, as mentioned above.

The British tabloids regularly relish in the tasteless way he flaunts his wealth. For example, he threw a £4m bar mitzvah for his son, Brandon, at the Grand-Hotel du Cap-Ferrat in 2005 with live performances from Andrea Bocelli and Destiny’s Child.

For his nephew, Matt, he threw a bar mitzvah at Madame Tussauds. Simon Cowell and Louis Walsh were guests, and One Direction performed. Matt and Green’s daughter Chloe shared a birthday party in December 2011 at One Mayfair, where Rihanna sang. The party cost over £1 million.  For his own 50th birthday, he flew 200 guests in a chartered Airbus A300 to a hotel in Cyprus for a three-day toga party. Guests were serenaded by Tom Jones and Rod Stewart, who was reportedly paid £750,000 for a 45-minute set.

Of course, when earned honestly, money can be spent according to individual whim.  But greedy Green’s cash comes from dirty ‘fast fashion’, tax dodging and worse.

why topshop is unethical

Sweatshops & Tax Avoidance

Sir Philip Green was appointed a knighthood in 2006. This was done perhaps unsurprisingly by the notoriously corrupt former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s recommendation. But by 2010, he was the target of activist group UK Uncut. The group pointed out that Green’s  acquisition of Arcadia in 2002 was done under the name of his wife, Tina.

Tina happens to have residency in  Monaco, a notorious tax dodger’s haven. This means Mr Green’s mega-company didn’t need to pay corporate tax in the UK. And yet, the Arcadia Group’s shops dominated the high street in every town.

Moreover, in 2013, Rihanna won a lawsuit against Topshop for having used her image illegally on a T-shirt. This led customers to assume that the pop-singer endorsed the company. Using images without permission? Just another example of Topshop selling unethical fashion.

But the perhaps biggest reason why Topshop represents unethical fashion is this. The whole Arcadia group offers low pay and poor working conditions to both overseas and UK workers.

This was pointed out by anti-sweatshop groups such as Labour Behind the Label, No Sweat and the student activist network People & Planet.

In 2003, when The Guardian was conducting an investigation into Green’s corporate finances, Green responded to the publication’s queries on the subject with a string of expletive-laden outbursts about the  paper’s  financial editor, Paul Murphy. Green said: “He can’t read English. Mind you, he’s a f**king Irishman.” He later apologised to the Irish, after customers threatened to boycott his stores.

Pension Robber

Most recently and perhaps worst of all, Green has been splashed all over British  headlines  for having  enriched himself by stealing £517 million, which included the pension funds of employees at BHS, the department store he owned from the mid-nineties until 2015.

Over the course of fifteen years, Philip Green extracted hundreds of millions of pounds from BHS employee’s pension funds. And the year after Green sold the company for approximately $1.40 – yes, just over one dollar – to the serially bankrupt ‘businessman’ Dominic Chappell, the chain unsurprisingly collapsed. Thousands of were cut jobs in the process. Clearly, Green knew what he was doing when he took out those hundreds of millions!

New Toys

Recently, Topshop store cleaners lamented the fact their wage did not cover rent and food. But this has not prevented Mr Green from buying a £46 million private jet and a new £100 million yacht.

As a reaction, the flagship BHS store in London was customised by protestors.  They gave it an ironic makeover in early August. The store got converted into an ironic “yacht club,” according to its new sign, to shame Philip Green for buying  several super yachts during the collapse of BHS.

So when you are tempted to wander in one of the Arcadia stores, remember that any purchase will not only help finance the greedy, corrupt Green family’s latest toys, but it will also contribute to the unsustainable, unethical fast fashion industry which Green is so much a part of.

why topshop is unethical

…And The Latest News Is Really Bad

As if all of this weren’t bad enough, Mr Green was named by a member of the House of Lords as the businessman who used an injunction to suppress the publication of sexual harassment allegations by five employees.  Several members of parliament threatened to reveal Green’s name after The Daily Telegraph ran a story headlined: “The British #MeToo scandal which cannot be revealed.”

The newspaper said the second-most senior judge in England issued a temporary injunction Tuesday against the publication of sexual harassment and racial abuse allegations against their boss. But House of Lords peer Peter Hain told a hushed session Thursday that he was using his “parliamentary privilege” to disclose the alleged businessman’s name.

“I feel it is my duty under parliamentary privilege to name Philip Green as the individual in question given that the media have been subject to an injunction preventing publication of full details of a story which is clearly in the public interest,” he said.

Down With Topshop!

Countless people are now saying that Green should be stripped of his knighthood. That’s following the report of a committee of Members of Parliament which illuminates his avaricious and wildly irresponsible stewardship of BHS.

The Cabinet Office has confirmed that Sir Philip Green’s knighthood is under investigation because of his part in the destruction of BHS, which is costing 11,000 people their jobs and threatening to reduce the pensions of 20,000 others. But we’re sure nothing will happen to Green, given his connections in the highest places of office.

Green has been in court over the BHS debacle several times this year. Time will tell whether he will face the legal justice he deserves. But for now, as a consumer, you can do your share. Give Green his just desserts by shopping far away from anything related to the Arcadia Group.

What do you think? Is Topshop unethical? Let us know in the comments, below!

Chiara Spagnoli Gabardi
Latest posts by Chiara Spagnoli Gabardi (see all)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top