Animal Aid Articles Magazine

Animal Abuse in Films: Why Hollywood is No Place for Animals

maxresdefault

By Arwa Lodhi

In many popular films, animals play a key role: from the tiger in Life of Pi to Cheetah in Tarzan, some movies just wouldn’t be the same without them. However, these sentient beings may be suffering greatly as a result of their being used for our entertainment.

Decades ago, animals actually were killed for movies: real rhinos were killed for the old Tarzan films (more than one, in fact!); Apocalypse Now included the slaughter of an ox, and horses were often badly hurt in many Westerns and had to be euthanised as a result. Consequently, the the American Humane Association (AHA) was called in by directors to ensure that animals were protected during shooting. The No Animals Were Harmed in the Making of this Film tag was meant to assure viewers of this; however, as this report shows, we can no longer trust the AHA to do their job.

But apparently, the AHA isn’t doing its job. The tiger in the Life of Pi was nearly drowned, and the email that expressed concern for the animal’s welfare was suppressed, as you can hear more about in the video above.

The Hollywood Reporter goes on to list a whole range of horrific animal violence on film:

–A Husky dog was punched repeatedly in its diaphragm on Disney’s 2006 Antarctic sledding movie Eight Below, starring Paul Walker

–A chipmunk was fatally squashed in Paramount’s 2006 Matthew McConaughey-Sarah Jessica Parker romantic comedy Failure to Launch.

–Several dozens of dead fish and squid washed up on shore over four days during the filming of Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Crewmembers had taken no precautions to protect marine life when they set off special-effects explosions in the ocean.

–A giraffe died on Sony’s 2011 Zookeeper set

And guess what? All of these productions had AHA monitors on set.

Clearly, the AHA’s “No Animals Were Harmed” seal of approval is extremely misleading to filmmakers and audiences alike. According to PETA, “the AHA does not monitor living conditions of animals off set, during pre-production training, or during the premature separation of infants from their mothers. The organization, which is funded by the Screen Actors Guild—the very industry that it is monitoring—rarely, if ever, files formal complaints when animals are mistreated. In fact, AHA actively defends the use of great apes in film and television productions despite expert testimony indicating that great apes cannot be trained for entertainment without subjecting them to physical abuse”.

As Angelica Houston points out in the video above, there is nothing glamorous about showbiz for animals. No matter how well they may be trained or how gently they may be treated, the fact is that most are torn away from their mothers as infants, and subjected to abusive training methods–remember, it’s not natural for animals to ‘perform’ and the ‘carrot’ works less effectively than ‘the stick’. These animals are then forced to spend most of their lives in small, filthy cages, deprived of everything that is natural and important to them. Trainers who supply animals to the entertainment industry are frequently cited by the U.S. Department of Agriculture for violating the federal Animal Welfare Act, which establishes only minimal guidelines for animal care, and social animals such as primates, elephants, and wolves are often forced to live alone, causing them severe psychological stress and anxiety.

With computer generated images being able to create almost any scene realistically, isn’t it time we eliminated animals from entertainment altogether? We encourage all our readers to vote with their wallets–unless the animals in a film are animated or CGI, let’s all avoid lending support to inhumane movie studios that promote the abuse of our four-legged friends.



You Might Also Like

3 Comments

  • Reply
    Stephanie Kolby
    Apr 16, 2014 at 11:05 pm

    Terrible! But good to know. Eluxe rocks. Keep it up!

  • Reply
    Brooke
    Jul 20, 2015 at 10:12 pm

    Thank you for such an informative post about the treatment of animals. Many times we don’t think about what happens behind the camera and it’s unfortunate to realize the elephants in Water for Elephants were harmed by trainers beforehand. I hope we can use more CGI and keep animals out of show business if they’re going to be continually harmed.

    • Reply
      Chere
      Jul 20, 2015 at 11:25 pm

      SO agree with you Brooke!! It just breaks the heart knowing these poor animals have suffered for some stupid film. The actors should take a stand and refuse to be in a film with any live animals! They have some real clout…but so do we, voting with our wallets! 🙂

    Leave a Reply